9 Comments

Thank you for writing this and pointing out Hollywood’s endless list of painful portrayals of Japan and the Japanese, Matt.

Glad you mentioned Mickey Rooney. His performance as Yunioshi in Breakfast at Tiffany’s, however brief it may have been, made it impossible for me to enjoy the otherwise wonderful movie when I first saw it many decades ago.

It took me many years before I finally managed to see Lost in Translation in full. The othering and infantilizing of many of the Japanese characters made me turn off the movie in disgust after just a few minutes each time I tried to watch it. I never quite understood why so many people liked this movie so much.

The first Shogun series started a fascination with Japan in the U.S. and other countries that lasted several years. It is going to be extremely interesting to see what effects this Shogun will have.

Expand full comment
author

I was just discussing that with someone else! Many (including Clavell himself) trumpeted the 1980 Shogun as a watershed moment in US-Japan relations, but none of that stopped the Japan bashing of the decade to follow. So I see both Shoguns more as reflections of their times than catalysts for change.

Expand full comment

I tend to agree, Matt. It did indeed not seem to have any immediate political or diplomatic effects. I do believe that it gave rise to a cultural curiosity about Japan that hadn't really been there before. I can't think of any other novel or TV series that so accurately mark the transition period between seeing Japan as a (defeated) enemy nation, and a nation with a culture worth knowing more about for its own merits. Over the years that curiosity slowly grew.

Expand full comment
author

It absolutely must have humanized the Japanese for American readers. Shogun arrived right as the West was reevaluating Japan as a peaceful nation, and it wasn't only Clavell -- narrative nonfiction like Robert Whiting's classic "The Chrysanthemum and the Bat" (1977) and academic books like Ezra Vogel's "Japan as Number One" (1979) were bestsellers, too. Really interesting time in US-Japan relations to be sure. Today, we're already familiar with Japan in so many ways. I hope the new miniseries' success unlocks more Japan-set content. Maybe a Pure Invention miniseries? One can dream! :)

Expand full comment

"Pervs in bed"? Having only ever seen that one "Lost in..." movie you mention, the expression surprised me, not recalling any beds therein at all (other than the hotel one the main character slept in), let alone any "pervs". But now that we're 'there'. do you explore that particular aspect of the Japanese scene anywhere? With one of the lowesr rape stats on the planet (and *please* nobody tell me that's only because US soft power hasn't defined rape properly *for* them yet!), it's my hunch that Japan's acceptance of the 'abnormal' in sexuality contributes very greatly to its harmony and remarkable absence of widespread violence.

Thankyou also for including the link to that 1981 NYT longform piece - what a read that one is!

Expand full comment
author
Sep 19·edited Sep 20Author

There is a scene involving a callgirl sent to Bill Murray's character's room, where she begs him to "rip her stockings," with the added "joke" of her having a hard time pronouncing the "r," yet another tired trope on top of the rest.

And I'd take that stat with a huge grain of salt. Reported sex assaults do not equal actual sex assaults. The fact that all-women trains are needed to keep female riders safe from unwanted touching, and the constant messaging to speak up if you're a victim, speaks volumes on that front.

I'd also suggest that what many Westerners see as "abnormal" is actually what a lot of locals see as "abnormal" too. It is largely a quirk of law that the portrayals of sex are what they are in Japan, rather than any kind of fundamental variance in cultural mores. The fact the West has appropriated so many terms from Japanese porn, often incorrectly (like "hentai," among others) is a testament to that.

Expand full comment

See Matt i just fail to get that "reported" vs "actual" riff. Is not the "actual" what whoever claims it *wants* to be true? IOW nothing more than pure speculation and presumption?

I've spent plenty of time in Japan and have never seen many femmes clamouring to get on the female only carriage!

Expand full comment
author
Sep 20·edited Sep 20Author

We are way off topic here so I’ll make this the last I say on this, but it most certainly isn’t speculation. For just one of many examples: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/commentary/2024/04/10/japan/sexual-violence-japan-nhk-survey/

Expand full comment